| Home | About | Add topic | Newsletter | Contact us |
Brainstorming New Ideas For WellnessAid To Develop
We want WellnessAid to meet your needs. That is why we have to have your feedback and ideas. If you have any ideas that you would like WellnessAid to develop add them here as comments to this article. It can be any idea, including the most crasy sounding one. We promise to take all of the ideas that you submit very seriously. If you want us to contact you, please, include your contact information. Thank you.
sponsors:
Dare To Change
View uncertainty as an opportunity.
Continue to learn and grow.
www.wellnessaid.com/carole
Natalia Zhezlo, M.Econ.
Personalized Financial Planning for All Stages of Life
www.wellnessaid.com/natalia
testimonials:
"Bill Gates... asked me to personally respond to you... I am a physician who serves as Microsoft's worldwide health director... I surveyed your portal site and commend your work... All of us at Microsoft wish you the very best."
Bill Crounse, MD Director, Worldwide Health, Microsoft Corporation www.microsoft.com
More pictures, music, interactive tools. Focus on topics that will not take more than a few minutes to review. Everyone’s very busy – reading articles is ok only if they are really exiting. Thanks.
by Fiona, 1 january 1970, 03:00 | reply
I guess just keep going and attract more people. More people – more interest. It takes time to build a community. Would be good to have an opportunity to post articles automatically rather then sending them via “contact us”.
by Galen, 1 january 1970, 03:00 | reply
Many articles fit under several categories. Add an option to post the same article under different categories – this will make the site more interesting.
by Healer, 1 january 1970, 03:00 | reply
I'm finding it rather shallow and limited. I would be interested in topics/conditions/diseases addressed from many different perspectives, not just the standard and very limited, western/allopathic viewpoint. Include the herbal/nutritional/aromatherapy/acupuncture etc. angle.
by kateyb, 1 january 1970, 03:00 | reply